700-702
Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure for System Engineers
700-702 Exam Guide: What the ACISE Record Means and How to Prepare Responsibly
Exam 700-702 is identified in a Cisco Community discussion as “ACI for System Engineers (ACISE),” but Cisco’s current exam catalog does not list 700-702, and the supplied official retirement page does not expose a 700-702-specific record. That distinction determines the right preparation decision: first confirm whether an employer, training plan, or legacy requirement still refers to this code; then use current Cisco ACI material—or the current 300-620 DCACI exam objectives where appropriate—without assuming the two exams are identical.
What is 700-702?
The available evidence identifies 700-702 as the “ACI for System Engineers (ACISE)” certification in a Cisco Community discussion dated May 5, 2015. That source establishes the historical name, not a current exam policy, blueprint, delivery method, or active registration route.
For a candidate researching this code today, the most important fact is its uncertain current status. Cisco’s current official exam catalog describes itself as a list of currently available exams, and 700-702 does not appear there. Cisco’s official retired-certifications page states that the certifications listed on that page have been retired, but the accessible page does not expose a 700-702-specific record.
Therefore, this page should not be read as confirmation that 700-702 can currently be scheduled. Treat the code as a legacy reference until Cisco or the organization requiring it provides a current, verifiable path.
Who was the certification intended for?
The historical title points to system engineers working with Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure, but the supplied evidence does not provide an official candidate profile or prerequisite policy for 700-702. Prepare around the work the credential was meant to represent, while avoiding assumptions about seniority, job title, or required experience.
Cisco describes ACI as a comprehensive data-center networking solution built around policy-driven connectivity, centralized policy management, and dynamic network provisioning. That description gives useful context for the likely subject area: a candidate would need to understand how infrastructure policy represents application connectivity and how that policy is applied to the data-center network.
The title “for System Engineers” should not be expanded into an unsupported claim that the exam was limited to system engineers, nor should it be treated as evidence of a current certification pathway. If a manager or recruiter cites 700-702, ask whether the requirement refers to a historical credential, a course, or a current ACI implementation certification.
What does the available evidence say about the skills tested?
No official 700-702 exam blueprint, domain list, percentage weighting, question format, score, duration, language, or delivery information is included in the supplied research. It would be misleading to present the current 300-620 DCACI scope as the measured skills of 700-702.
The only directly supported subject context is ACI and its policy model. Cisco’s current product description refers to policy-driven connectivity, centralized policy management, and dynamic network provisioning. Those concepts are sensible study anchors for ACI fundamentals, but they are preparation guidance rather than a recovered 700-702 objective list.
Do not use an unverified blueprint or a third-party list of supposed 700-702 topics as if it were Cisco’s official specification. In particular, avoid assigning percentages to domains. No 700-702 domain percentages are available in the supplied sources, so there are no supported weights to prioritize.
Should you book 700-702 or pursue a current exam?
Do not pay for or schedule an exam under the 700-702 code until the code is confirmed through a current Cisco registration or an authoritative requirement from the organization sponsoring it. Cisco’s current catalog does not list 700-702, while Cisco currently offers 300-620 DCACI v1.1 as the active ACI-related exam identified in the supplied evidence.
Use this decision sequence:
1. Ask the person or organization that gave you the 700-702 requirement whether it is a historical reference and whether a current replacement is accepted.
2. Check Cisco’s current exam catalog and the relevant Cisco exam page rather than relying on an old course listing or a forum post.
3. If the actual goal is a current Cisco ACI implementation credential, review 300-620 DCACI v1.1 and its current requirements. Cisco states that passing it earns the Cisco Certified Specialist – Data Center ACI Implementation certification and can satisfy the CCNP Data Center concentration-exam requirement.
4. If the goal is historical knowledge of ACI for system-engineering work, study ACI concepts and lab skills without representing that preparation as proof of eligibility for 700-702.
This approach separates three decisions that are often confused: whether 700-702 is available, whether a current credential meets the business requirement, and whether the candidate needs ACI knowledge independent of certification.
What current Cisco exam is relevant to the same technology area?
Cisco’s current ACI-related exam in the supplied official research is 300-620 DCACI v1.1. Cisco says it covers Cisco switches in ACI mode, including configuration, implementation, and management. This is a current reference point for study planning, but it should not be described as a confirmed renaming or direct replacement for 700-702.
Cisco currently describes 300-620 DCACI v1.1 as a 90-minute English exam priced at US$300. Those details belong to 300-620, not to 700-702. Do not transfer its duration, language, price, or current status to the historical code.
The current DCACI training page states that the training prepares learners for 300-620 DCACI v1.1 and has no prerequisites. That is useful if your decision is to pursue the current exam, but it does not establish that 700-702 had no prerequisites or that the same course prepares candidates for the older certification.
How should you study when the old blueprint is unavailable?
Build a technology-centered plan instead of pretending that an unavailable blueprint exists. Start with ACI’s policy model, then connect policy decisions to implementation and management tasks. This gives you a practical foundation while keeping every claim about 700-702 appropriately qualified.
A useful sequence is:
1. Establish the architecture vocabulary. Define what policy-driven connectivity means in an ACI environment, why centralized policy management matters, and how dynamic network provisioning changes the way connectivity is delivered.
2. Trace a policy from intent to outcome. For each study example, identify the application or connectivity requirement, the policy objects that express it, and the expected network behavior. The goal is to reason from a requirement rather than memorize isolated interface labels.
3. Add implementation thinking. Practice determining what must be configured, what dependencies must exist, and how you would verify that the intended connectivity is actually being delivered.
4. Add management and troubleshooting thinking. For a failed outcome, distinguish a policy-definition problem from an implementation problem or an operational-management problem.
5. Reconcile the plan with the current exam if you choose 300-620. Use the official current exam page and training information to replace assumptions with the published scope for that exam.
This sequence is a practical recommendation, not a reconstructed 700-702 exam outline. Its purpose is to reduce wasted study effort while the historical code remains unverified.
What should you learn first about ACI?
Begin with the relationship between application intent and network behavior. Cisco’s description of ACI emphasizes policy-driven connectivity, centralized policy management, and dynamic network provisioning; those ideas should become the organizing framework for your notes and lab work.
Do not start by collecting disconnected commands or screenshots. First write a plain-language requirement such as “these application components need permitted communication,” then ask how an ACI policy model would express that requirement and how you would confirm the resulting behavior.
Create a three-column study record: requirement, policy decision, and verification evidence. In the first column, describe the desired connectivity. In the second, record the policy structure or configuration choice you are studying. In the third, state what output, status, or observed behavior would prove that the choice worked. The exact interface names and commands should come from current Cisco learning material, not from memory or an unverified 700-702 dump.
This method is especially valuable for a legacy exam reference because it develops transferable reasoning rather than tying your preparation to a question set whose official status cannot be confirmed.
How can you turn theory into a useful lab plan?
Use a small, repeatable ACI lab or guided exercise that lets you move from policy definition to implementation and management checks. The lab is a preparation recommendation; the supplied sources do not confirm a required 700-702 lab, simulator, or test-day environment.
For each exercise, record five items:
1. The business or application requirement being represented.
2. The policy objects or relationships you created.
3. The expected connectivity or provisioning result.
4. The evidence you used to verify the result.
5. The change you made when the result was wrong.
Repeat the same exercise with one deliberate error at a time. For example, change a policy relationship, omit a dependency, or apply an incorrect configuration choice, then document how you would isolate the cause. Do not infer that these exact scenarios appear on 700-702; their value is that they make policy and operational reasoning concrete.
If you cannot access a lab, use diagrams and configuration walkthroughs as a substitute, but mark every conclusion as expected behavior until you can validate it in an authorized environment or current Cisco material.
How should current 300-620 material be used without confusing the exams?
Use current DCACI resources as a clearly labeled ACI study reference or as preparation for 300-620 itself—not as proof of what 700-702 tested. Cisco’s current training page explicitly prepares learners for 300-620 DCACI v1.1, and Cisco’s exam page describes that exam as covering configuration, implementation, and management of Cisco switches in ACI mode.
If you are pursuing 300-620, read the current official exam page first and align your study notes to its published scope. If you are investigating 700-702 for a historical reason, extract the underlying technology concepts but keep a separate note identifying which facts belong only to the current exam.
A practical notebook structure is: “700-702 evidence,” “current DCACI requirements,” and “general ACI concepts.” This prevents accidental transfer of current exam details—such as the current exam’s duration, language, price, or credential outcome—to the legacy code.
The separation also helps when reporting progress to an employer. You can say that you have studied ACI concepts or prepared for 300-620, but you should not claim that either statement proves a current 700-702 certification route.
What common preparation mistakes should you avoid?
The largest mistake is treating an old exam code as automatically active. The second is assuming that a current ACI exam is a confirmed replacement without a Cisco statement or acceptance from the organization that set the requirement.
Other avoidable errors include:
• Relying on a 2015 community discussion as though it were a current exam guide. The discussion is useful evidence for the historical name, but it is not an official blueprint or policy page.
• Repeating a current 300-620 fact under the 700-702 label. The 90-minute duration, English language, US$300 price, current availability, and certification outcomes are supported for 300-620, not for 700-702.
• Studying only definitions. ACI’s policy model is easier to retain when each concept is connected to a requirement, a configuration decision, and a verification step.
• Buying exam dumps or leaked-question claims. Memorizing unauthorized material does not establish that the code is active, does not validate the material, and cannot guarantee a pass.
• Using the phrase “retired” without checking the evidence. The supplied official retired-certifications page does not expose a 700-702-specific record, so the careful statement is that the code is not listed in the current catalog and its specific status is not established by the accessible retirement page.
• Listing unsupported domain percentages. No official 700-702 weighting is available in the supplied research.
A practical four-stage study roadmap
A staged plan lets you make progress without committing prematurely to an unavailable registration path. Complete the status check first, then build ACI understanding, practice implementation reasoning, and finally align your evidence with the credential you will actually pursue.
Stage one—validate the target. Save the requirement you received, identify whether it refers to a certification, course, or internal skill requirement, and ask for the accepted current code. Check Cisco’s current catalog and exam information before purchasing training or booking anything.
Stage two—build the conceptual foundation. Study ACI as a policy-driven data-center networking solution. Explain in your own words how centralized policy management and dynamic network provisioning relate to the connectivity requirement you are trying to satisfy. Create diagrams that connect application intent to policy and expected behavior.
Stage three—practice configuration and management reasoning. Work through authorized current ACI learning material and exercises. For every activity, write the prerequisite, the change made, the expected result, and the verification method. Include at least one troubleshooting pass in which you diagnose a deliberately incorrect outcome.
Stage four—make the credential decision. If the requirement is current Cisco certification, evaluate 300-620 DCACI v1.1 using Cisco’s current page. If the requirement remains specifically 700-702, obtain written confirmation of its accepted status and registration route before treating any study plan as exam preparation. If no route is available, report the evidence honestly and propose the current credential or a skills-based ACI plan as the alternative.
This roadmap does not assign unsupported study durations or promise a result. It gives each stage a decision or deliverable so that preparation remains useful even if the historical code cannot be scheduled.
What should you verify before registering?
Registration should follow confirmation, not precede it. For 700-702, verify that the code is accepted, currently deliverable, and tied to the outcome you need; the supplied official sources do not establish those points.
Use this final checklist:
• Is 700-702 present in a current Cisco registration or exam catalog?
• Has the requesting organization confirmed that 700-702, rather than a current ACI credential, is required?
• Is there an official page describing the exam’s objectives, delivery, language, duration, price, and scoring? The supplied evidence does not provide those details for 700-702.
• If you are switching to 300-620 DCACI v1.1, have you checked its current official page rather than assuming equivalence?
• Are your training materials clearly labeled as current DCACI preparation, general ACI learning, or historical 700-702 material?
• Are you avoiding unauthorized questions and unsupported claims about likely exam content?
If the answer to the first two questions is no, pause the booking decision. Continue learning ACI if it supports your role, but do not present that activity as confirmed preparation for an active 700-702 examination.
What is the sensible next action for a 700-702 candidate?
The next action is to resolve the credential-status question with evidence. Cisco’s current catalog does not list 700-702, and the supplied official retirement page does not provide a code-specific conclusion; meanwhile, current Cisco information points candidates toward 300-620 DCACI v1.1 for an active ACI implementation exam.
If your employer supplied the code, request the source and the accepted alternative in writing. If your goal is current Cisco recognition, compare that requirement with the current DCACI outcome: Cisco states that passing 300-620 earns the Cisco Certified Specialist – Data Center ACI Implementation certification and can satisfy the CCNP Data Center concentration-exam requirement.
If your goal is technical capability rather than a badge, begin the ACI study sequence now: policy model, application-to-policy reasoning, implementation, verification, and management. Keep the historical 700-702 label separate from current exam claims.
That combination of verification and skills practice avoids the two costly extremes: abandoning useful ACI learning because an old code is uncertain, or spending money and study time on a registration path that the current evidence does not confirm.
Conclusion
700-702 should be treated as a historical ACI for System Engineers reference unless a current, authoritative requirement confirms otherwise. The available evidence does not supply an active blueprint or registration profile for that code. Confirm the target first, then choose between general ACI skills development and the current 300-620 DCACI v1.1 pathway, keeping the two exam identities and their supported facts separate.
Related exams
- 350-021 exam — CCIE SP Cable Qualification Exam
- 500-052 exam — Deploying Cisco Unified Contact Center Express
- 500-460 exam — Enterprise Mobility Essentials for Sales Engineers
- 646-365 exam — Cisco Express Foundation for Account Managers (CXFA) Exam
- 648-238 exam — Implementing Cisco Connected Physical Security 1
- 648-385 exam — Cisco Express Foundation for Field Engineers