UiPath Certification: How the Credential Ecosystem Fits Together
UiPath’s certification ecosystem is built for people who design, develop, analyze, operate, test, and lead automation programs. Its official program separates broad core role tracks from specializations in AI-powered automation and software testing, with Associate and Professional offerings appearing across the available voucher catalogue. This overview explains how those paths differ, what evidence can indicate readiness, how to prepare without treating certification as a memorization exercise, and which practical questions to answer before selecting a UiPath credential.
Start with the role you want to validate
The most sensible UiPath certification is usually the one that matches the work you already perform or intend to perform next. UiPath describes its core role tracks as covering foundational and advanced roles across the automation lifecycle, while its specialization track is aimed at deeper expertise in AI-powered automation and software testing. That structure makes role fit more useful than choosing an exam solely because it appears available or has a particular level label. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html)
A developer, business analyst, solution architect, infrastructure engineer, testing specialist, or AI-focused practitioner may all work with UiPath while solving materially different problems. The credential catalogue reflects that distinction. It includes Automation Developer Associate and Professional, Automation Business Analyst Associate and Professional, Automation Solution Architect Professional, Infrastructure Engineer Professional offerings, Specialized AI Associate and Professional, Agentic Automation Associate and Professional, and testing-related credentials. The available catalogue can change, so readers should verify the current program information before registering. (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/)
Certification should therefore be treated as a statement about a defined capability area, not as a general substitute for every kind of UiPath experience. A person who builds workflows may need a developer path; someone who translates business needs into automation opportunities may be better aligned with a business analyst path; and someone responsible for platform deployment and maintenance should examine the infrastructure path. The right choice depends on the responsibilities the candidate needs to demonstrate.
Use the core tracks for broad role coverage
The core role tracks are the natural starting point for candidates whose work follows a recognizable automation job function. The official UiPath page presents these tracks as serving professionals who build and scale automation programs, from foundational roles through advanced roles. That wording supports a progression-oriented view of the programme, but it does not mean every candidate must complete every credential in sequence. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html)
Associate offerings may suit someone establishing capability in a role, while Professional offerings may be more appropriate when the candidate is already responsible for broader or more demanding work. That is a practical selection principle rather than a universal prerequisite rule: the supplied official sources do not state that every Professional exam requires a particular Associate certification first. Candidates should check the current requirements for the specific exam before assuming that a lower-level credential is mandatory.
Use specializations when the work is narrower and deeper
Specialization is a better fit when the candidate’s responsibilities center on an emerging or distinct area rather than the full breadth of an automation role. UiPath identifies AI-powered automation and software testing as specialization areas. The marketplace lists Specialized AI Associate and Professional vouchers, along with Agentic Automation Associate and Professional offerings and testing credentials. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html) (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/)
A specialization does not automatically replace a core role credential. A developer who works with AI may reasonably compare a developer credential with Specialized AI or Agentic Automation, while a testing professional may focus on the testing path. The decision should turn on the capability the reader wants the credential to represent and the projects available for practice.
What the main UiPath paths are designed to represent
The available voucher descriptions provide useful signals about the intended audience of several paths. Read those descriptions as scope indicators, then compare them with the current exam information and the candidate’s actual responsibilities before purchasing. The catalogue is not a complete substitute for a current program guide. (https://uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/index)
Automation Developer
Automation Developer credentials are the most direct option for practitioners whose work centers on building automation. The marketplace lists both Associate and Professional Automation Developer vouchers. The supplied sources do not provide a complete list of skills or prerequisites for either exam, so a candidate should use the current UiPath program information to distinguish the expected depth before booking. (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/)
A useful readiness question is whether you can explain and reproduce the development decisions behind an automation rather than merely follow a tutorial. Review the kinds of workflows, integrations, exception handling, and operational considerations represented in the official exam description or preparation material. Keep the recommendation practical: use supported learning resources and build or review representative solutions, but do not infer that passing can be guaranteed by memorizing questions.
Automation Business Analyst
Automation Business Analyst credentials are intended for the business-facing side of automation. The catalogue lists Associate and Professional vouchers, including the Automation Business Analyst Associate among its offerings. The role is distinct from implementation-focused development because its central concern is identifying, describing, and shaping opportunities in a business context. (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/)
Candidates considering this path should compare the exam scope with their daily work: requirements discovery, process understanding, stakeholder communication, opportunity assessment, and translating business needs into automation direction may be more relevant than building every workflow themselves. Those are practical indicators for selection, not additional official eligibility requirements. The current UiPath program documentation should decide the precise exam expectations.
Automation Solution Architect
The Automation Solution Architect Professional offering is aimed at candidates whose responsibilities extend across solution design and the way automation components fit together. It is a sensible path for someone who must reason about an automation programme or solution as a whole rather than only implement isolated workflows. The official marketplace lists the credential as a Professional voucher. (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/)
A candidate should be able to discuss architectural trade-offs in the context of real automation work, including how requirements become a maintainable solution and how the design supports delivery and operation. Before selecting it, confirm that the current exam description matches the scope of your role. The supplied sources do not establish a mandatory developer credential or other prerequisite for this exam, so readers should not assume one.
Infrastructure Engineer
Infrastructure Engineer Professional is the clearest fit for people responsible for the technical foundation that supports enterprise process automation. The Standalone Part 1 description specifically concerns deploying, maintaining, and upgrading enterprise-wide process automation in a standalone Windows environment. The learning-credit catalogue also lists an Infrastructure Engineer Professional—Automation Suite voucher. (https://usd-voucherstore.pearsonvue.com/p/UPVCH-IEP1-USD) (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/)
The environment named in the Standalone Part 1 description matters. Candidates should distinguish experience with a standalone or Windows deployment from experience with Automation Suite rather than treating the two offerings as interchangeable. Choose the exam whose environment and operating responsibilities reflect the work you can actually explain and troubleshoot. The supplied sources describe Standalone Part 1 but do not provide the complete scope or sequencing rules for other Infrastructure Engineer exams.
Specialized AI and Agentic Automation
Specialized AI and Agentic Automation are appropriate comparison points for candidates whose work goes beyond conventional workflow automation. The catalogue lists Specialized AI at Associate and Professional levels and Agentic Automation at Associate and Professional levels. (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/)
The Agentic Automation Professional voucher description is more specific: it validates the ability to design, build, and govern solutions that orchestrate autonomous agents, RPA workflows, enterprise systems, and human decision-making. That makes it particularly relevant to candidates whose responsibilities include the design and governance of such combined solutions, rather than simply experimenting with an AI feature. (https://uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/p/UPVCH-AAP)
The supplied official evidence does not define the complete boundary between Specialized AI and Agentic Automation. A candidate should therefore compare the current exam objectives, launch or retirement information, and recommended preparation material before deciding between them. The existence of both labels is a reason to inspect scope carefully, not a reason to assume that one is automatically the next step after the other.
Software testing and Test Cloud
Testing is a distinct route within UiPath’s specialization coverage. Pearson VUE describes the Software Testing Engineer Professional credential as demonstrating expertise in building AI-powered, data-driven test-automation solutions. The marketplace also lists the UiPath Test Cloud Architect Professional exam, described as validating the ability to execute, monitor, and optimize end-to-end testing processes using UiPath Test Cloud. (https://usd-voucherstore.pearsonvue.com/p/UPVCH-STEP-USD) (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/uipath-test-cloud-architect-professional-exam/p/UPVCH-TCAP)
The Test Cloud voucher page states that its voucher is also applicable to the Software Testing Engineer Professional exam. That is a voucher applicability rule, not evidence that the two credentials have identical objectives or that candidates should choose between them without checking the current programme information. A testing practitioner should compare the role emphasis: building AI-powered, data-driven test automation versus executing, monitoring, and optimizing end-to-end testing with UiPath Test Cloud. (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/uipath-test-cloud-architect-professional-exam/p/UPVCH-TCAP)
The catalogue labels the Test Cloud listing as an Associate exam level even though the product name includes Professional. Because that presentation is potentially confusing, verify the credential’s current official classification and exam details before relying on the label when planning a progression.
How to decide between Associate and Professional
Choose Associate when the credential’s published scope matches your developing role; choose Professional when your responsibilities and evidence of practice match the broader or more advanced scope. Do not select a level solely because it appears to be the next badge in a sequence. The official sources show Associate and Professional offerings, but they do not establish one universal progression rule across every UiPath path. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html)
A sensible comparison uses three tests. First, compare the exam’s official objectives with the work you perform. Second, assess whether you can explain decisions and diagnose problems without step-by-step assistance. Third, check any formal prerequisites or recommended training in the current UiPath Certified Professional programme information. If the role fit is weak, moving to a higher label will not correct the mismatch.
The role tracks also make lateral movement reasonable. A candidate may begin as a developer and later move toward architecture, business analysis, infrastructure, testing, AI, or agentic automation as responsibilities change. The available evidence supports a programme covering multiple roles and specializations; it does not support a claim that one route is best for everyone.
A practical decision map
If your main deliverable is a workflow or automation component, begin by comparing Automation Developer offerings. If your main deliverable is a business case, process assessment, or requirements definition, compare Automation Business Analyst offerings. If you design the wider solution, investigate Automation Solution Architect. If you deploy and operate the supporting platform, compare Infrastructure Engineer offerings. If your work centers on testing, compare Software Testing Engineer and Test Cloud Architect. If it centers on AI or autonomous-agent orchestration, compare Specialized AI and Agentic Automation. These are role-based recommendations derived from the catalogue descriptions, not official eligibility rules. (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/)
Where two paths appear plausible, choose the one that best reflects the work you can document. A project portfolio, design review, process map, deployment record, or test strategy can help reveal whether your experience is primarily development, analysis, architecture, infrastructure, testing, or AI-oriented. The exercise is for readiness and fit; it does not replace the official exam requirements.
Questions to answer before registering
Before paying for an attempt, confirm the exact credential name, level, exam status, current objectives, recommended training, practice-test availability, delivery options, identification rules, and any prerequisites. Pearson VUE directs candidates to UiPath’s Certified Professional website for exam launch and retirement information, so do not rely on an old catalogue page or a third-party summary for time-sensitive status. (https://uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/index)
Also ask whether the credential supports your immediate work objective. If an employer needs someone to maintain a Windows deployment, an infrastructure offering may be more relevant than a developer credential. If your assignment is testing in Test Cloud, the Test Cloud description may be more useful than a broad role track. If your responsibility is governance of agentic solutions, examine the Agentic Automation Professional scope rather than assuming a general AI label covers it.
Build preparation around capability, not recall
The strongest preparation approach combines the official exam scope with applied work in the same role area. Pearson VUE’s UiPath page directs readers to the UiPath Certified Professional Program Overview for full descriptions, exam formats, recommended training, and practice tests. Start there, then use the scope to identify what you can perform, explain, or troubleshoot. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html)
A good preparation plan has four parts: map the objectives, close knowledge gaps, practise the relevant work, and verify administrative readiness. The first part prevents unfocused study. The second identifies missing concepts or platform experience. The third tests whether you can apply those concepts in realistic situations. The fourth reduces avoidable appointment or delivery problems. None of these steps guarantees a passing result, and no source supports treating memorized or unauthorized exam questions as a substitute for preparation.
Map the official scope to your experience
Create a private checklist from the current official exam description. For each topic, record whether you can explain the concept, perform the task, review someone else’s implementation, and diagnose a failure. This is especially useful when comparing adjacent paths, such as Developer with Solution Architect, Software Testing Engineer with Test Cloud Architect, or Specialized AI with Agentic Automation.
Keep the checklist tied to the selected exam. Do not assume that experience with one UiPath role automatically demonstrates another. For example, the supplied Infrastructure Engineer description emphasizes deployment, maintenance, and upgrading in a standalone Windows environment; that is a different preparation center of gravity from workflow development or business analysis. (https://usd-voucherstore.pearsonvue.com/p/UPVCH-IEP1-USD)
Use official learning and practice references deliberately
The official programme page identifies recommended training and practice tests as resources to consult. Use them to understand the exam format and the type of preparation UiPath recommends, while checking that the material is current for the exam you intend to take. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html)
Practice questions are most valuable when they expose a reasoning gap. After answering, explain why the correct option fits the stated situation and why the alternatives do not. For role-based credentials, supplement that work with small, documented exercises: analyze a process for the business analyst path, review a solution design for architecture, rehearse deployment and maintenance reasoning for infrastructure, or create a testing approach for the testing path. Those exercises are practical recommendations, not claims about the exact exam question format.
Treat experience as a readiness signal
Readiness is stronger when you can connect platform actions to business or operational consequences. A developer should be able to justify implementation choices. An analyst should be able to distinguish an attractive idea from an automatable process opportunity. An architect should be able to explain how a solution is organized. An infrastructure engineer should be able to reason about deployment and maintenance. A testing specialist should be able to connect test design, execution, monitoring, and optimization. An AI or agentic-automation candidate should understand not only how to assemble capabilities but also the governance implications described by the credential scope.
These indicators help candidates decide whether to study more or select a different path. They are not additional UiPath requirements. Only the current official exam information and Candidate Agreement determine formal conditions for participation.
Choose test-center or online delivery after checking constraints
Both authorized test-center delivery and Pearson VUE OnVUE online testing are presented for UiPath exams, but the convenient option is the one whose requirements you can reliably meet. Pearson VUE asks test-center candidates to arrive 15 minutes before the appointment and warns that arriving more than 15 minutes late may lead to refused admission and forfeiture of the exam fee. Candidates must also bring one original, valid, unexpired government-issued ID with a photograph and signature, with the registered first and last name matching the ID exactly. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html)
OnVUE requires a suitable private environment and a compatible setup. The stated minimum technology includes Windows 10 or macOS 14 or higher, a working webcam, microphone, and speaker, one display, and an internet connection with at least 6 Mbps download and 2 Mbps upload. Pearson VUE says candidates must run and pass the system test on the same device and network they will use on exam day. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath/onvue.html)
Online delivery is not simply a test-center exam moved to a home office. Pearson VUE prohibits virtual machines, beta operating systems, mobile devices, headphones or earbuds, smart or connected recording or AI devices, additional or touchscreen displays, VPNs, and corporate or public/shared networks for UiPath online testing. The testing space must also be quiet, private, and free of prohibited materials and people viewing the screen. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath/onvue.html)
During check-in, candidates complete technology checks, photograph themselves and their ID, and complete a 360-degree room scan. If a requirement is not met, Pearson VUE says the candidate cannot test and the fee will be forfeited. Review the current OnVUE page before selecting this option, particularly if your work device is managed by an employer or your home network uses restrictions that cannot be changed. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath/onvue.html)
Candidates must also accept the UiPath Certified Professional Candidate Agreement before scheduling or taking an exam. Online rules prohibit cheating, another person taking the exam, recording or sharing the screen, leaving the webcam view without an approved break, speaking or reading aloud unless instructed, and accessing a phone unless explicitly permitted. Violations can result in the exam being revoked and the fee forfeited. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath/onvue.html)
When a test center may be the simpler choice
A test center may be preferable when your home or office cannot satisfy the OnVUE rules, when your computer is locked down, or when your network is a corporate or shared connection. It also removes the need to prepare a compliant room and perform the online system test on the exam device and network. Confirm local availability through the Pearson VUE UiPath page before booking. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html)
When OnVUE may be workable
OnVUE may suit a candidate who has a private, quiet room, a compliant computer and network, a single display, and the required identification. Run the system test early and repeat the practical checks before the appointment. Pearson VUE notes that a proctor cannot pause or extend the exam or troubleshoot the candidate’s device or network; if the computer freezes or disconnects, candidates are instructed to close and relaunch OnVUE and seek customer service help if the issue persists. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath/onvue.html)
Understand vouchers before buying one
A voucher is a prepaid exam fee, and Pearson VUE’s UiPath marketplace says one voucher provides one UiPath Certified Professional exam attempt. Vouchers are non-refundable and non-returnable, normally valid for 12 months from purchase unless otherwise noted, and must be used before the stated expiration date. A voucher should therefore be purchased only after the candidate has identified the exact exam and has a realistic plan to schedule it. (https://uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/index)
The marketplace provides separate products for individual exams, Associate or Professional groups, universal coverage, and learning-credit redemption. The learning-credit catalogue lists UiPath vouchers with prices in learning credits, including one-credit Associate listings and two-credit Professional listings, but the applicable product and terms should be confirmed at purchase. (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/)
The standard catalogue also displays specific dollar prices for some vouchers. For example, the Agentic Automation Professional voucher is listed at $300, while the Software Testing Engineer Professional voucher is listed at $150. Prices and product availability are time-sensitive, so readers should treat those figures as catalogue information for the linked products rather than a permanent programme-wide fee schedule. (https://uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/p/UPVCH-AAP) (https://usd-voucherstore.pearsonvue.com/p/UPVCH-STEP-USD)
The Infrastructure Engineer Professional—Standalone Part 1 voucher is listed at US$300 and is described as usable at an authorized test center in the selected country or for an online-proctored exam. Its product page says the voucher may be used in any country besides Japan and must be scheduled and taken within twelve months of purchase. Check country restrictions and the product’s terms before ordering. (https://usd-voucherstore.pearsonvue.com/p/UPVCH-IEP1-USD)
Some marketplace pages include promotional products with different expiration terms. The index states that a promotional voucher may expire three months after purchase, while standard vouchers normally expire 12 months after purchase unless otherwise noted. Do not assume that a promotional deadline applies to every product, or that a standard term applies to a special offer. Read the voucher email and product terms. (https://uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/index)
The marketplace says order information is emailed within 2 hours from purchase, with a confirmation email followed by an email containing the voucher, expiration date, and terms. If the message does not appear, check spam, junk, and promotional folders before contacting support. (https://uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/index)
Plan the appointment around the voucher and policy
Redeem the voucher to schedule through Pearson VUE and ensure that registration and the exam occur before the voucher expiration date. Pearson VUE’s UiPath page says candidates can schedule, reschedule, and cancel through the Pearson account portal. (https://uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/index) (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html)
For a scheduled exam, rescheduling or cancellation must be completed at least 48 hours before the appointment through the Pearson account or customer service. Cancelling or rescheduling later, or failing to appear, can result in forfeiture of the exam fee. Build a buffer into the plan instead of scheduling on the last possible date. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html)
Budget for a retake without assuming immediate availability
If a candidate does not pass on the first attempt, UiPath’s Pearson VUE policy requires a wait of two weeks before retaking the exam. For a third and subsequent attempt, the policy requires at least one month between each retake, and every attempt requires applicable exam fees. One voucher covers one attempt, so a retake normally requires planning for another fee rather than assuming the original voucher remains available. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html)
A sensible UiPath certification path can change over time
UiPath’s ecosystem supports progression, but progression should follow the candidate’s expanding responsibilities rather than a rigid badge-collection sequence. A person may first establish a role foundation, then add a Professional credential when the work becomes broader, or move into a specialization when projects demand AI, agentic automation, testing, architecture, or infrastructure expertise. The official sources show the available tracks and offerings but do not prescribe one route for every career. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html)
For an individual, the next credential should answer a specific question: What capability do I need to demonstrate now? For an employer, the question may be: Which role does this person perform, and which exam scope matches that role? Voucher purchasing can support team planning because Pearson VUE describes vouchers as prepaid exam fees for organizations planning and managing RPA enablement. (https://uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/index)
A team should avoid assigning the same exam to everyone simply because all members work on automation. Developers, analysts, architects, infrastructure specialists, testers, and AI-focused practitioners may need different evidence. A role-aligned plan also makes preparation more efficient because candidates can practise tasks connected to their actual responsibilities.
Example progression decisions without a fixed ladder
A developing workflow builder might compare Automation Developer Associate with a different path only if their work is primarily analysis or testing. A developer who later owns cross-solution design could investigate Automation Solution Architect Professional. Someone moving into platform operations could compare Infrastructure Engineer offerings, paying close attention to the stated deployment environment. A testing practitioner might evaluate Software Testing Engineer Professional against Test Cloud Architect based on whether the work emphasizes building test automation or executing, monitoring, and optimizing end-to-end Test Cloud processes. These are selection examples, not official prerequisites or guaranteed sequences. (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/) (https://usd-voucherstore.pearsonvue.com/p/UPVCH-IEP1-USD) (https://usd-voucherstore.pearsonvue.com/p/UPVCH-STEP-USD) (https://lc-uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/uipath-test-cloud-architect-professional-exam/p/UPVCH-TCAP)
Recheck the programme before committing
Certification catalogues are not static. Pearson VUE directs candidates to the UiPath Certified Professional website for exam launch and retirement dates, and the marketplace can show current products, promotional terms, and voucher availability. Recheck the official programme information immediately before purchase and again before scheduling, especially if your plan depends on a particular exam name, level, price, or expiration period. (https://uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/index)
Final selection checklist
A good UiPath certification decision is one you can explain in role terms and execute within the programme’s administrative rules. Before selecting an exam, confirm the following:
• The credential matches the work you want to validate: core role or specialization.
• The Associate or Professional scope matches your present evidence of capability.
• The current official exam page confirms the exam is available and states any requirements.
• Your preparation uses the current programme description, recommended training, and practice references.
• You have chosen a delivery method whose technology, room, identification, and network rules you can meet.
• Your appointment leaves time before the voucher expiration date.
• You understand the 48-hour rescheduling and cancellation rule, arrival requirements, retake waiting periods, and the cost of another attempt.
• You have reviewed and accepted the UiPath Certified Professional Candidate Agreement.
These checks do not make certification automatic. They do help prevent a common avoidable mistake: buying an exam before confirming that its role, scope, delivery method, and timing fit the candidate. For the next step, start with the official UiPath programme information and the Pearson VUE scheduling or voucher page that corresponds to the path under consideration. (https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/uipath.html) (https://uipathmarketplace.pearsonvue.com/index)
Conclusion
UiPath’s certification ecosystem is best understood as a set of role tracks and specializations rather than a single linear ladder. Begin with the responsibility you need to demonstrate, compare the relevant Associate and Professional scope, and investigate specialized options when your work centers on AI, agentic automation, testing, Test Cloud, architecture, or infrastructure. Then validate the current exam information, prepare through official scope and applied practice, and confirm the delivery and voucher rules before booking. That process gives readers a defensible next step without assuming that one UiPath credential fits every automation career.
Related exams
- UiPath-ABAAv1 exam — UiPath Automation Business Analyst Associate Exam (2023.10)
- UiARD exam — UiPath Certified Advanced RPA Developer
- UiPath-ARDv1 exam — UiPath Advanced RPA Developer v1.0 Exam (UiARD)
- UiPath-SAIAv1 exam — UiPath Specialized AI Associate Exam (2023.10)
- UiPath-AAAv1 exam — UiPath Certified Professional Agentic Automation Associate (UiAAA)
- UiPath-ADAv1 exam — UiPath Automation Developer Associate v1 Exam
- UiPath-ABAv1 exam — UiPath Certified Professional Automation Business Analyst Professional v1.0
- UiPath-ADPv1 exam — UiPath (ADPv1) Automation Developer Professional Exam
- UiPath-ASAPv1 exam — UiPath Automation Solution Architect Professional v1.0 Exam
- UiPath-SAIv1 exam — UiPath Certified Professional Specialized AI Professional v1.0
- UiPath-TAEPv1 exam — UiPath Test Automation Engineer Professional v1.0 Exam